Impact of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Relating to Sexual Offences: A Study of Its Effects on Victims, Accused, and Witnesses in the Light of Criminal Jurisprudence and Constitutional Principles

Authors

  • Dr. Jai Prakash Kushwah Advocate, M.P. High Court, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (India), Ph.D. (Law an inter disciplinary Research), Ph.D.(Geographical Crime a Multidisciplinary Research), DLIL, LL.B., LL.M.(Medalist), B.Sc. (Maths), MA (English), MA(Geography)IGD Bombay, EGD Bombay. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0618-363X
  • Suraj Pratap Singh Kushwah Advocate, M.P. High Court, LL.B., LL.M. (Gold Medalist), Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8599-1397

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v9n2.03

Keywords:

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, BNS, sexual offences, victims' rights, accused rights, witness protection, criminal jurisprudence, due process, consent, gender neutrality, constitutional principles

Abstract

The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), replacing the Indian Penal Code of 1860, introduces significant reforms in criminal law, including provisions relating to sexual offences. This study critically examines the impact of these changes on victims, the accused, and witnesses, emphasizing their alignment with criminal jurisprudence and constitutional principles. Key innovations in the BNS, such as redefining sexual offences, strengthening victim-centric approaches, and introducing measures to safeguard the under-trial persons as well as witnesses, are analysed. The BNS incorporates provisions aimed at expediting justice, enhancing protections, and ensuring dignity to the victims. These include stricter punishments for offences like rape and sexual harassment and improved mechanisms for victim compensation. However, concerns about potential gaps, such as subjective interpretations of consent or challenges in implementation, remain significant. The rights of the accused are also recalibrated under the BNS. While the law seeks to balance punishment with due process, questions arise about whether procedural safeguards adequately prevent misuse and wrongful convictions. Provisions such as shifting burdens of proof and mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences may conflict with the presumption of innocence and the principle of proportionality. Witnesses, often neglected in traditional frameworks, gain some protection under the BNS through provisions to shield their identities and reduce harassment. However, systemic challenges like delays, intimidation, and lack of support mechanisms persist, potentially undermining these measures. This study evaluates the BNS through the lens of criminal jurisprudence, considering doctrines such as mens rea, proportionality, and due process, and juxtaposes these with constitutional values like equality, dignity, and fairness. While the BNS strives to modernize and streamline sexual offence laws, it also raises critical debates about harmonizing punitive measures with rehabilitative goals, ensuring gender neutrality, and preventing the weaponization of laws. In conclusion, while the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 represents a progressive step in redefining the legal framework for addressing sexual offences, its ultimate impact will depend on consistent interpretation by the judiciary, robust enforcement mechanisms, and complementary societal reforms.

References

State of Punjab v. Major Singh, AIR 1967 SC 63, emphasizing the limitations of the term “modesty.”

Justice J.S. Verma, Leila Seth, and Gopal Subramanium, Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law (2013), para. 13.

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 354D (stalking) and Section 376E (digital voyeurism).

Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India, (1995) 1 SCC 14, emphasizing the need for victim rehabilitation and support systems.

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 223 (fair trial guarantees).

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248, on procedural fairness as a fundamental right.

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684, emphasizing proportionality in sentencing.

Sakshi v. Union of India, (2004) 5 SCC 518, highlighting the challenges faced by witnesses in sexual offence cases.

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, (1978) 4 SCC 494, discussing the reformative approach to criminal justice.

https://legalfly.in/bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita/

https://lawfullegal.in/bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023-offences-against-woman/

Ibid 11

https://vajiramandravi.com/upsc-daily-current-affairs/mains-articles/bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-bill-2023-background-objectives-provisions/

K.K. Verma v. Union of India, 1955 AIR 525, 1955 SCR 1235

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam, (2003) 2 SCC 119.

T.V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1983 AIR 361, 1983 SCR (2) 294.

Sakshi v. Union of India, 2004 (5) SCC 518

Mahender Chawla v. Union of India, (2019) 13 SCC 372

State of Gujarat v. Kishanbhai, (2014) 5 SCC 108.

Pappu Yadav v. State of Bihar, 1997 SCC (4) 35.

State of Gujarat v. Kishanbhai, (2014) 5 SCC 108.

Mahender Chawla v. Union of India, (2019) 13 SCC 372

State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram, (2006) 12 SCC 254.

Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1997) 6 SCC 59.

Mithu v. State of Punjab, (1983) 2 SCC 277.

State of Bombay v. R. M. D. C. Ltd., AIR 1957 SC 699.

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam, (2006) 6 SCC 757.

Khatri v. State of Bihar, (1981) 1 SCC 627.

Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, No. 13 of 2013, Acts of Parliament.

Published

30-03-2024
CITATION
DOI: 10.53724/inspiration/v9n2.03
Published: 30-03-2024

How to Cite

Dr. Jai Prakash Kushwah, & Suraj Pratap Singh Kushwah. (2024). Impact of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Relating to Sexual Offences: A Study of Its Effects on Victims, Accused, and Witnesses in the Light of Criminal Jurisprudence and Constitutional Principles. Research Inspiration, 9(II), 08–24. https://doi.org/10.53724/inspiration/v9n2.03

Issue

Section

Articles

ARK