Model Based Testing And Uml Diagrams: A Literature Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Model based testing is an abnormal state testing method which utilizes abnormal state plan documentations. It has a few points of interest over code based experiment plan. Testing in light of configuration models has the favorable position that the experiments stay legitimate notwithstanding when the code changes a tiny bit. So plan models can be utilized as a premise for experiment era which results in decreasing the expense of testing. The way toward creating test cases from configuration will find issues ahead of schedule in the advancement procedure and along these lines spare time and assets amid improvement of the framework. This paper gives a brief presentation, and general definitions to acquaint MBT, and presents related writing.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Pakinam N. Boghdady, Nagwa L. Badr, Mohamed Hashem and Mohamed F. Tolba, “A Proposed Test Case Generation Technique Based on
Activity Diagrams”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology IJET-IJENS Vol: 11 No: 03
Debasish Kundu and Debasish Samanta, “A Novel Approach to Generate Test Cases from UML Activity Diagrams”, Journal of Object
Technology, Vol: 8 No: 3, May/June 2009.
Santosh Kumar Swain, Durga Prasad Mohapatra and Rajit Mall, “Test Case Generation Based on State and Activity Models”, Journal of
Object Technology Published by ETH Zurich, Chair of Software Engineering, © JOT 2010 Online at http://www.jot.fm
Raida Elmansouri, Houda and Allaoua Chaoui, “From UML Activity Diagrams to CSP Expressions: A Graph Transformation Approach using
Atom3 Tool”, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol: 8 Issue 2, March 2011, ISSN (Online): 1694-0814 www.IJCSI.org
Mingsong Chen – Prabhat Mishra – Dhrubajyoti Kalita, “Efficient test case generation for validation of UML activity diagrams”, 18 June
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010, 105-13-DOI 10.10.07/s10617-010-9052-4
Baikuntha Narayan Biswal, Pragyan Nanda and Durga Prasad Mohapatra, “A Novel Approach for Scenario-Based Test Case Generation”,
-0-7695-3513-5/08 $25.00 © 2008 IEEE, DOI 10.11.09/ICIT.2008.43
A.V.K. Shanti and G. Mohan Kumar, “A Heuristic Technique or Automated Test Cases Generation from UML Activity Diagram”, Journal of
Computer Science and Applications, ISSN 2231-1270 Volume 4, Number 2 (2012), pp. 75-86
Monalisha Khandaj, Arup Abhinna Acharya, Durga Prasad Mohapatra, “Test Case Generation for Concurrent System using UML
Combinational Diagram”, (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 2(3), 2011, 1172-1181
Santosh Kumar Swain and Durga Prasad Mohapatra, “Test Case Generation from Behavioral UML Models”, International Journal of
Computer Applications (0975-8887) Volume 6-No.8, September 2010
Ridham Khurana and Anuj Saha “Emperical Comparison of Test Data Generation Techniques using Activity Diagrams”, International
Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887) Volume 51-No.7, August 2012
Chen Mingsong, Qiu Xiaokang, and Li Xuandong, “Automatic Test Case Generation for UML Activity Diagram”, AST ’06, May 23, 2006,
Shanghai, China. Copyright 2006 ACM 1-59593-085-X/06/0005
I. Wang, J. Yuan, X. Yu, J. Hu, X. Li, and G. Zheng. Generating test cases from UML Activity diagram based on gray-box method. In 11th
Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC ’04), pages 28-291, Busan, Korea, 2004.
Irum Rauf, Muhammad Zohaib Z. Iqbal and RZafar I. Malik, “Model Based Testing of Web Service Composition Using UML Profile”, 2nd
Workshop on Model-based Testing in Practice (Mo TiP 2009), session 2, paper3.
Luis Fernandez-Sanz, Sanjay Misra, “Practical Application of UML Activity Diagrams for the generation of Test Cases”, Proceedings of the
Romanian Academy, Series A, Volume 13, Number 3/2012, pp. 251-260.
Swagatika Dalai, Arup Abhinna Acharya and Durga Prasad Mohapatra, “Test Case Generation For Concurrent Object-Oriented Systems
Using Combinational UML Models”, (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2011
Dalal. S. Jain, A. Karunanithi, N. Leaton, J. Lott, C. Patton, G. and Horowitz, B. 1999, “Model-Based Testing in Practice”. In Proceedings of
the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, California, US, May 16-22 1999 IEEE/ACM, 285-294.
Pretschner. A. Prenninger, W. Wagner, S. Kuhnel, C. Baumgartner, M. Sostawa, B. Z’olch, R, and Stauner. T. (2005), “One Evaluation of
Model-based Testing and Its Automation”. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, St. Louis, MO,
Pages: 392-401, ISBN: 1-59593-963-2. ACM New York.
Utting M. Pretschner, A., and Legeard, B. (2006), “A taxonomy of Model-based testing”. ISSN: 1170-487X, The University of Waikato, New
Zealand.
Ibranhim K. El-far and James A. Whittaker, “Model-based Software Testing” in John J. Maarciniak (Ed), Encyclopedia of Software
Engineering (2 volume set), 2nd Edition, Wiley, Dec 2001.
Hans-Gerhard Gross, Marc Bom, Ina Schieferdecker, Pedro Santos, “Model-Driven Development and Testing – A Case Study”. This work
has been partially supported by the BMBF project MDTS on Model-Driven Development of Telecommunica-tion Systems, 2005.
Antonia Bertolino, “Software Testing Research: Achievements, Challenges, Dreams,” in Proc. Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007),
co-located with 29th ICSE 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 23-25 May 2007. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007, pp. 85-103.